South Coast APA Message Board
South Coast APA Message Board
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 South Coast APA
 General Discussion
 New Forum Created
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Phil


USA
829 Posts

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  5:01:56 PM  Show Profile  Visit Phil's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I have created a new forum on this message board, called "Spirit of the Rules". This forum is for discussion of situations where common sense should prevail over the technical interpretation of the rules. Topics in this forum may be compiled into a "Common Sense" guide at some point in the future.

Phil

ginger


USA
35 Posts

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  7:32:58 PM  Show Profile  Visit ginger's Homepage  Send ginger a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
hahaha LOVE IT!

-ginger

*It's better to have loved and lost, then to live with the psycho for the rest of your life*
Go to Top of Page

BigRigTom


USA
102 Posts

Posted - 04/21/2008 :  4:27:40 PM  Show Profile  Visit BigRigTom's Homepage  Send BigRigTom a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
[i]Originally posted by Phil[/i]
[br]I have created a new forum on this message board, called "Spirit of the Rules". This forum is for discussion of situations where common sense should prevail over the technical interpretation of the rules. Topics in this forum may be compiled into a "Common Sense" guide at some point in the future.

Phil




Phil would this qualify for one of your common sense rulings?
A player chooses to hit a shot in which the cue ball is less that the width of a piece of chalk from the object ball and upon hitting the cue ball with follow thru the cue ball strikes the object ball then the cue ball passes the object ball and beats the object ball to the rail or even to the pocket.
My common sense ruling would be:
That was a double hit, even if there was no 3rd eye and even if the shooter swears it wasn't, common sense dictates that it was a double hit! Ball in hand to the opponent, even if the shooter was my teammate it makes NO difference it is still a foul!

BigRigTom
http://hardingersystems.com/BAT-Forum to discuss Billiards and Trucking or anything that interest you!
Go to Top of Page

Phil


USA
829 Posts

Posted - 04/21/2008 :  7:37:42 PM  Show Profile  Visit Phil's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Nope. Common sense is just that, common. It's something that makes sense to the common person. What you describe makes sense to those who understand the physics of the game, but is likely to cause angst among the commoners. Therefore, we rule the way we do on those - no third party, no foul.

Phil
Go to Top of Page

BigRigTom


USA
102 Posts

Posted - 04/21/2008 :  8:55:16 PM  Show Profile  Visit BigRigTom's Homepage  Send BigRigTom a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
Ha Ha!
I see your point and it is a good one.

BigRigTom
http://hardingersystems.com/BAT-Forum to discuss Billiards and Trucking or anything that interest you!
Go to Top of Page

Kerry Randolph


USA
172 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  07:15:03 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Angst and commoners?

It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
South Coast APA Message Board © 2007 South Coast APA Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05